I do not think the scientific popes and their corporative masters behind will agree with any other version of the Universe that departs from their comfortable picture loaded with vulgar materialism. ]]>

But if you want to do REAL physics, you will have to repair the Lorentz-Maxwell theory of magnetostatics, such that its force law satisfies Newton’s third law of motion also for OPEN circuits of stationary currents (yes, some locations with time varying charge densities exist for such circuits), and by doing this we derive a more general electrodynamics theory which DOES NOT HAVE THE 4/3 PROBLEM. In other words, who needs the Higgs particle in order to explain “mass” if we can solve the 4/3 problem of classical electrodynamics and explain inertia/mass as an electrodynamical phenomenon?

Ok, I make physics easy for you, take the red pill and read my paper here

http://vixra.org/pdf/1505.0132v1.pdf , however, you can also take the blue pill, and watch these perfectly closed circuits of stationary electric currents (sourced by good old batteries and capacitor banks just like the ones used by Ampere, Gauss, Weber, Faraday, etc …) as a glitch in the Matrix, with your naive eyes spinning around in your head following these closed loops, not knowing that you are a slave in a Matrix world, where Higgs just won the most important price of “real science”.

Last year I got back into it ernestly and finally properly derived the Gkl using the affine connection. The electron wave traces a helical path in constant forward motion. The Rotor position vector is the eigenvector. Gravity slows down the rotation and the helical path spirals outward. The cylinder becomes a flute with intrinsic curvature.

So now I am relearning the Weyl, Dirac, Schrodinger, Pauli equations and comparing with the wavefunction of the Rotating Wave. It is all such beautiful poetry. As a young boy I learned how to hoe the vineyard and that led me to wonder what is gravity. The soil is fertile and it needs be turned.

Google Christie Wavicle to see the model. Disregard the attempt at the long derivation of Gkl. It has been corrected by the more recent and simple derivation just last year.

My email address is billchristiearchitect@gmail.com

Bill Christie

]]>Regards

Helmut ]]>

The main point I was attacking at gthe BICEP2 results was their methodological carelessness and their

additional, hilarious claims. ]]>